ルノー・日産アライアンス、変革が必要＝仏経済・財務相

コメント

注目のコメント

• 藤田 研一

  K-BRIC&Associates,Ltd 代表取締役社長　兼　プリンシパル

  ・2019年05月23日

  ルノーへの配当をもっと増やす変革が必要。
  できれば日産の吸収を前提にしたマネジメント改革。
  こういう事でしょう？
  
  アライアンス強化で合意
  と言っても、日仏の思惑は違いますよね。
• 四方 藤治

  M&Aイノベーション・コンサルティング代表 博士(法学)

  ・2019年06月04日

  The Alliance among Renault, Nissan and Mitsubishi that Mr. Ghosn has endeavoured to figure out and put in practice seems to be a yet confusing concept for many.
  It certainly is not an established business concept. Its definition could not be found anywhere.
  
  However, it is obvious it at least has never aimed a conventional merger or consolidation, as such. It was something unique and unexperienced and must be understood to be evolving while running, facing up to changing problems.
  
  Legally, I find it quite similar to the Regulated Company in 16th-17th centuries, where each member as a constituency of the Company kept its independence and was engaged in its own trading business on its account and responsibility, subject to certain regulations of the Company.
  
  I am of the opinion that what Mr. Ghosn tried to create is exactly what the Regulated Company once brought about prior to a modern limited company by shares which became prevailing later.
• 水野 伸洋

  うまくいっていない時の統合は共倒れの予感しかしない。